In a horrible show of state run mind control, the Big Government unleashed constant salvo after salvo to get the brain damaging mind controlling fluoride into the water. But facts are facts:
1) The amount of fluoride in water does NOT excrete topically by a person at a level to protect teeth
2) Long term studies of cities that fluoridate vs. those that don’t show NO DIFFERENCE in cavity rates
3) The dangers associated with fluoride exposure are clear and well documented – Bone Cancer, Thyroid Damage, Tooth WEAKENING
4) Fluoride is a poison by it’s official classification
5) The Fluoride they USE is not a scientifically prepared exact chemical, instead it is chemical waste from China containing hundreds of harmful chemicals.
There are many government funded and dentist funded groups aimed at keeping fluoride in the water. It’s a money maker for dentists because it increases bone weakness and therefore cavities. In this piece of trash science put out by dentists, when you actually look a the long list of studies cited as evidence FOR Fluoridation, only two are from real scientific journals and digging deeper actually READING the study they cite in FAVOR of fluoride, the truth is the opposite – “In the past, caries has usually increased after cessation of water fluoridation. More recently an opposite trend could be observed: DMFT remaining stable or even decreasing further” – Caries Res 2000;34:20-25, Caries Prevalence after Cessation of Water Fluoridation in La Salud, Cuba, W. Künzel, T. Fischer. This is actually cited as evidence FOR Fluoridation by the quack dentist group Institute for Science in Medicine – http://www.scienceinmedicine.org/policy/papers/AntiFluoridationist.pdf.
In the largest study ever done and often quoted as PRO fluoridating drinking water, if you actually read the scientific paper you find this odd fact “No noteworthy differences were observed between groups in relation to restorative care received (%F/DMFS) or required (%D/ DMFS), as shown in Table 7. However, with respect to the types of tooth surfaces affected, children with exposure to fluoridation had proportionally less caries on mesial and distal surfaces (Table 8). Although it might be expected that a similar difference would be evident on buccal and lingual surfaces, this was not the case.”
Journal of Dental Research, Volume 69 (Special Issue); Page 723-727. February 1990, Recent Trends in Dental Caries in U.S. Children and the Effect of Water Fluoridation, J.A. Brunelle and J.P. Carlos, Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Dental Research, National Institutes of Health, Westwood Building, Room 538, Bethesda, Maryland 20892
This is a government run study not done by scientists. It is out of Bethesda Maryland for gods sake. And it isn’t to be trusted.
What this means is that the areas of the tooth that would contact the saliva and be most protected from water fluoridation, in fact were not more protected. The article also includes another important tidbit – “The sharp decline in dental caries among US schoolchildren, which was first documented in 1980, evidently continued at approximately the same rate during the subsequent 6-7 years.” So for dentists, basic cavity service is slowing down. As brushing habits have improved, They NEED the fluoride to weaken teeth to maintain their profits.
Furthermore the article writes – “No convincing evidence has been offered to refute the conclusion that the dramatic decrease in dental caries observed in the US children during recent decades is primarily the result of this exposure to fluoride.” While there may be no hard evidence, it is certainly quite possible that all of this is due to better brushing. In 1982 they actually had an international conference to discuss what to do with regards to declining cavity rates – the solution? FLUORIDE! (1982): First International Conference on the Declining Prevalence of Dental Caries)
The same scientist who broke the whistle that caries had DECREASED in Cuba after Cuba CEASED water fluoridation (W. Kunzel) also has an very interesting paper titled “Effect of an interruption in water fluoridation on the caries prevalence of the primary and secondary dentition.” Every scientific PubMed abstract listing source has BLOCKED the viewing of the abstract. This is highly unusual. What finding are they afraid to show? This is a key study because it shows what happens when you STOP adding fluoride. If the dentists and government are correct, cavities should go up.
Kunzel also writes another article showing that after Germany ceased fluoridation caries(cavities) declined – “[Caries decline in Germany–causes and consequences]. Künzel W. Gesundheitswesen. 1997 Dec;59(12):710-5. German. ”
After much work, I finally found the article that was blocked in all American sources. And it states – “A different caries trend was observed in the years from 1987 to 1995. There was a significant caries decrease down to the lowest DMFT (2.0) since 1959 in spite of the fact that only F-poor water was available over years in both towns. This improvement of oral health is explained by changes in caries-preventive and environmental conditions”
In another key study, dental fluorosis (weakening of teeth) was observed versus fluoridation levels in water and cavity rates. Their conclusion? “A suitable trade-off between caries and fluorosis appears to occur around 0.7 ppm F. Data from this study suggest that a reconsideration of the policies concerning the most appropriate concentrations for water fluoridation might be appropriate for the United States ” – DENTAL CARIES AND DENTAL FLUOROSIS AT VARYING WATER FLUORIDE CONCENTRATIONS, K E Heller, S A Eklund and B A Burt Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA Abstract from Journal of Public Health Dentistry 57 (3) 136-143 1997
0.7 ppm actually occurs NATURALLY in most water supplies. Game over dentists, your scam will no longer stand the light of truth.
Game over water poisoners, you’re goose is cooked. You can’t stand up to real science and real data.
The media pressure on politicians who wish to remove this poison from our drinking water is government brain washing out in full force and it’s ugly to see.
For nearly 30 years, not a single Republican incumbent on the Pinellas County Commission has lost a general election. Voters ended that legacy Tuesday, ousting two commissioners among the board’s more conservative voices.
In the end, the races did not turn out to be the nail-biters that some had predicted. Republican Commissioner Neil Brickfield lost his District 1 seat to Democratic challenger Janet Long by almost 11 percentage points, prompting him to concede the race before 8 p.m. Commissioner Nancy Bostock, a Republican from Treasure Island, lost her District 3 seat by a slimmer margin — about 5 points — to former state Sen. Charlie Justice, a Democrat from St. Petersburg.
At a tense Republican watch party at the Hilton St. Petersburg Carillon Park hotel Tuesday night, Brickfield and Bostock blamed their losses on one issue: fluoride.
The pair were part of a bloc of commissioners who voted a year ago to stop adding the cavity-fighting mineral to the county’s drinking water.
The four commissioners who opposed fluoride said they were motivated by concern for public health while critics called the vote as a capitulation to tea party extremists who believe fluoride is harmful.
“The voters clearly said they want fluoride in the water,” Brickfield said. “And I will never vote against fluoride again as long as I live.”
Bostock said the fluoride issue was unfairly emphasized by the Tampa Bay Times in its election reporting and editorials. Throughout their campaigns, both candidates stuck by their votes and denied that fluoride was a major topic on voters’ minds.
“When I was out in the community the topic of fluoride came up very, very little. But the coverage of it was excessive,” Bostock said.
Oscar Menendez, a Palm Harbor dentist, strives to provide the best dental care for his patients. He also believes that fluoride should be added to Pinellas County’s water supply.
“It helps everybody. It helps the elderly people, it helps the decay, root carries as we get older. It helps the young people,” Menendez said. [WTF! Read the evidence above. No IT DOES NOT!]
Last year, after much heated debate, Pinellas County Commissioners voted 4-3 to stop adding fluoride to the water.
Now, Dr. Menendez is targeting two of the Commissioners who voted against keeping the fluoride and are up for re-election, Neil Brickfield and Nancy Bostock.
“I want to make a difference,” he said.
He hopes to make a difference with this billboard he paid for along US 19 in Palm Harbor. It supports two candidates, Janet Long and Charlie Justice, that are vying for commission seats in November’s election against Bostock and Brickfield.
“I want people to see, you want fluoride, you want good leadership, that’s my conviction,” explained Menendez.
REAL research: FLUORIDE: Current issue: http://www.fluorideresearch.org/453Pt1/files/FJ2012_v45_n3Pt1_p151-216_pq.pdf
SIMULTANEOUS FLUORIDE AND LEAD EXPOSURE ACTING AS A PRO-INFLAMMATORY FACTOR IN DIFFERENTIATED HUMAN THP1 MONOCYTIC CELLS
Low-level, chronic exposure of humans to fluorine compounds (F) in the air, water, and food may be atherogenic via the activation of oxidative stress and increased production of reactive oxygen species (ROS).
FLUORIDE AND LEAD INFLUENCE ON APOPTOSIS PROCESSES
IN THE LIVER CELL LINE HEPG2
Chronic, long-term exposure to high levels of fluoride leads to fluorosis, which
is manifested by skeletal impairment and damage to internal organs, including
kidney, liver, parathyroid glands, and brain. Studies have shown that excess
fluoride can cause DNA damage, trigger apoptosis, and change cell cycle.
CHANGED CHOLINERGIC SYSTEM AND NEURONAL SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION
IN RATS WITH DEFICIT OF LEARNING AND MEMORY INDUCED
BY CHRONIC FLUOROSIS
In order to reveal the mechanism of decreased learning ability and memory
induced by chronic fluorosis, nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs),
cholinesterase (ChE) activity, and the pathway of extracellular signal regulated
protein kinase (ERK1/2) were investigated using rats with chronic fluorosis from
water pollution and coal-burning pollution. Spatial learning and memory of the
rats were evaluated by Morris Water Maze test. The expressions of nAChRs,
ERK1/2 and mitogen-induced extracellular kinase (MEK1/2) at protein and
mRNA levels were detected by Western blotting and real-time PCR, respectively.
ChE activity was determined by chemical colorimetry. The results showed that the
learning and memory capacity in rats with chronic fluorosis was decreased.
SUPPLEMENTS, ISOTONIC DRINKS, AND ENERGY DRINKS AS POTENTIAL
SOURCES OF DIETARY EXPOSURE TO FLUORINE
COMPOUNDS IN ATHLETES
Supplements and isotonic drinks are major components of the diet of athletes,
whereas energy drinks are commonly used by nearly the entire population. The use
of animal proteins and plant-origin substances in these products suggests that they
may also contain fluorine compounds. As most supplements are ingested as
aqueous solutions, they may constitute a source of easily absorbable fluoride.
FLUORIDE CONCENTRATION IN INFANTS’ AND CHILDREN’S
DRINKS IN POLAND
Delivered at high doses and/or over long periods, fluorine compounds may
negatively affect the function of the immune and nervous systems, cause allergies,
and negatively alter thyroid function. Because of their higher susceptibility to
fluoride absorption, children are at higher risk than adults for these consequences
manifested by chronic fatigue, lowered IQ scores, and learning difficulties.
February 1998 JOURNAL of the International Society for Fluoride Research
TOXIC EFFECTS OF FLUORIDE ON BEATING MYOCARDIAL
CELLS CULTURED IN VITRO
GASTRODUODENAL MANIFESTATIONS IN PATIENTS
WITH SKELETAL FLUOROSIS.
S Dasarathy, T K Das, I P Gupta, A K Susheela and R K Tandon, India
ACUTE FLUORIDE TOXICITY FROM INGESTING HOME-USE DENTAL
PRODUCTS IN CHILDREN, BIRTH TO 6 YEARS OF AGE
OUTBREAK OF ACUTE FLUORIDE POISONING CAUSED
BY A FLUORIDE OVERFEED, MISSISSIPPI, 1993
TESTING THE POTENTIAL OF SODIUM FLUORIDE
TO AFFECT SPERMATOGENESIS IN THE RAT
Dr Miklos Bely, National Institute of Rheumatology, Budapest, Hungary
Prof N B K Yoshitake, Shiga University of Medical Science, Shiga-Ken, Japan
Prof Gene W Miller, Biology Dept., Utah State University, Logan UT 843226305, USA
Dr John Colquhoun, 81A Landscape Road, Mt Eden, Auckland 1004, New Zealand
Dr D J Ballentyne, University of Victoria, Victoria BC, Canada
Dr Miklos Bely, National Institute of Rheumatology, Budapest, Hungary
Prof A W Burgstahler, University of Kansas, Lawrence KS, USA (Editor)
Prof Shouren Cao, Chinese Academy of Preventive Medicine, Beijing, China
Dr M Chikuma, Osaka University of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Japan
D: John CGlqUhOUn, School of Education, University of Auckland, New Zealand (Editor)
Dr John A Cooke, University of Natal, Durban, South Africa
Dr Edward Czerwinski, Kracow Academy of Medicine, Poland
Prof Mark Diesendorf, University of Technology, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Prof G Embery, University of Wales Medical College, Cardiff, Wales UK
Dr Richard G Foulkes, Abbotsford BC, Canada
Prof J Franke, Heinrich Mann Hospital, Bad Liebens!ein, Germany
Prof G Neil Jenkins, Newcastle upon Tyne, England
Prof Rongdi Ji, Chinese Academy of Preventive Medicine, Beijing, China
Dr Y Kaneko. Showa University School of Dentistry, Tokyo, Japan
Prof K Kono. Osaka Medical College, Osaka, Japan
Pro; Jerzy Krechniak, Medical University, Gdansk, Poland
Dr KA V R Knshnamachan, National Institute of Nutrition Hyderabad, India
Prof Lennart Krook, Comell university, lthaca NY, USA
Dr John R Lee, 9620 Bodega My, Sebastopol CA, ?ISA
Prof C James Lovelace, Humbolt Stat3 University, Arcata CA, USA
Dr Zygnunt Machoy, Pomeranian M e d M Academy, Szczecin, Poiand
Prof G W Miller, Utah State University, Logan UT, USA (Co-Editor)
Prof F Murray, Murdoch University, Murdoch WA, Australia
Dr James C Pushnik, California State University, Chico CA, USA
Dr 8 P Rajan, Madras Dental College, Madras, India
Dr Bruce Spittle, Universiiy of Otago Medical School. Dunedin, New Zealand (Co-Editor!
Dr Jorg Spitz, Dept. of Nuclear Medicine, Wiesbaden, Germany
Prof Guifan Sun, China Medical University, Shenyany. China
ProfA KSusheeia, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
Prof S P S Teotia, LLRM Medical College, Meerui, India
Prof H Tsunoda, lwate Medical University, Morioka, Japan
Prof Zan-Dao Wei, Guiyang Medical College, Guizhou, China
Dr Sally Wheeler, Hawkesbury Agricultural Research Unit, Richmond NSW, Australia
Prof Y Yoshida, Osaka Medical College, Osaka, Japan
Prof N B K Yoshitake, Shiga University of.Medical Science, Shiga-Ken, Japan
Prof Ming-Ho Yu, Western Washington University, Bellingham WA, USA (Cc-Editor)
Vo1.31 No.1 Pages 1-58
OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR FLUORIDE RESEARCH
Dr John Colquhoun
Auckland, New Zealand
Prof A W Burgstahler
Lawrence, Kansas, USA
Prof G W Miller
Dr Bruce Spittle
Prof Ming-Ho Yu
Logan, Utah, USA
Dunedin, New Zealand
Bellingham, Washington, USA