Update: And now the evil people at Wikipedia have removed ALL TRACES of discussion from their talk page. I don’t exist. Leftists Win. Spread the world that Wikipedia is now a fully Leftist Hive. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:The_Great_Replacement_conspiracy_theory
Wikipedia has ONE article on the great replacement with the title “The Great Replacement Conspiracy Theory” and this is HARD MIND CONTROL because everyone who searches for “the Great Replacement” gets the impression that it’s just a crackpot idea. That is a lie. The Great Replacement is UTTERLY REAL and happening. Whether you believe that IT REQUIRES an ELITE HAND pushing us in that direction, OR NOT, the great replacement is a direction European and British and USA societies have found themselves FORCED INTO.
I tried to edit and correct it, but was of course destroyed by the CIA moderators. What a scam knowledge source. It’s the KALERGI PLAN and FAR FROM a CONSPIRACY THEORY.
The thing is, I know Wikipedia quite well. I knew their rules and controls. And so, when I went about – following all their ridiculous requirements – to make the correction or to create a new page, the leftist psychos shut me down at every step. Here is that story. But the principal thing you must understand is:
Wikipedia is CIA MIND CONTROL. It is NEITHER FAIR NOR NEUTRAL.
They put a HARD FORWARD so you could NOT create a page for “great replacement” and when I tried they censored it multiple times and FORCED it to be called a “conspiracy theory”
NOT ONLY did they create a fake page, they VIOLENTLY SILENCED ANYONE TRYING TO CREATE A NON CONSPIRACY PAGE even if it was a TOTALLY DIFFERENT PAGE!
Look at this rubbish they put on the page: “This article is about the French far-right conspiracy theory. For the article about the broader concept, see White genocide conspiracy theory.”
Why is this so important right now? Because the NZ shooter included “the great replacement” as part of his manifesto. So right now thousands (millions?) of clueless cucks will be searching on the term. And the very first thing they will see – BECAUSE IT IS IN THE TITLE OF THE ARTICLE – is that it is a conspiracy theory. That is societal control. That is leftist corruption of truth. And it’s wrong.
So they are constantly ANTI WHITE and decry the white extermination and genocide in Europe as a conspiracy theory? When government actors have QUOTES that that is precisely what they are doing? MADNESS!
This has been going on at Wikipedia for years. Just try to edit the article on the federal reserve and you will get slapped back to oblivion. I even FOLLOWED the rule to discuss on the talk page first. I even cited everything I said. NOPE! NOT GOOD ENOUGH.
One technique that the leftist Wikipedia has used to shut down discourse on the Great Replacement is by LINKING it to ISLAMOPHOBIA. Even though, the great replacement is race NEUTRAL and RELIGION NEUTRAL it has nothing specifically to do with ISLAM or MUSLIMS. In fact, more correctly stated, it is about the elites forcing AFRICANS into Europe and Hispanics (sick term meaningless but oh well) into America.
See the recent NYT article which lists “The Great Replacement” with a link to a Steve King article which has only FACTS about the great replacement, YET, the link is labeled “The Great Replacement Conspiracy Theory” that is EXACTLY the tactic that Wikipedia used to declare that SEE SEE it’s a conspiracy theory. Just because Lefties had linked to FACTS about replacement and labeled it a conspiracy theory in THEIR articles. That’s truth in lefty psychosis world.
And when you call them out on it? OH YOU are hateful. You are “Cherry Picking Articles” You are “Using Not Allowed Right Wing Sources”. I quickly discovered that ANY SOURCE which discusses white replacement is “a right wing hate source” and not allowed. This included Breitbart, DailyMail.co.uk (wtf!), Infowars (of course!), and Laura Southern!
The state of Wikipedia today is QUITE SICK and EVIL Anti Human Leftist SCUM.
Let’s talk about the great replacement. IS it just a conspiracy theory?
Although Zemmour is Jewish, his method is eerily reminiscent of Édouard Drumont’s
in La France juive, the greatest anti-Semitic tract of the nineteenth century,
49 except that for Zemmour the enemy within is not the Jew but the Muslim. Using sleight of hand, he slips from targeting those who “devirilized” France to attacking those who “lost” French colonies and allowed Muslims to take over France.
To understand his method, let us consider a chapter called “Woman is the Future of
Man.” It begins by denouncing the 1975 legalization of abortion, but then slips from abortion to immigration: “The traditional French family must give way in the name of ‘progress’ under individualist pressure; at the same time … the traditional North African family—the most archaic, the most patriarchal—is invited to replace it.” Drumont, La France juive: Édition populaire (1888), the first of at least 200 editions. p. 136-42.
So for more than 130 years this notion of replacing Europanics with Africans has been alive and well. Yet wikipedia aka Lie-apedia, says this is just conspiracy theory.
Great REplacement[edit source]
I created a correct and appropriate page for this topic. You are being incorrect in deleting it. There is nothing wrong with this page it is NOT any form of incorrect action on my part.Patriotmouse (talk) 20:43, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
- You are incorrect for many reasons. Discuss at Talk:The Great Replacement conspiracy theory. Grayfell (talk) 20:44, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
They used that to BAN ME for HARRASSMENT. Yah, well my BRAIN is being Harrassed by their COMMUNISM.
Of course, with the Kalergi Plan, and then the United Nations Population converence where they published an article recommending African replacement for Europe and Invited 70 heads of state to discuss it… well.. its just a conspiracy theory.
The UN Plan to replace White Population with African
“Therefore, among the demographic variables, only international migration could be instrumental in addressing population decline and population ageing in the short to medium term. As noted above, the most likely changes in fertility and mortality rates for Europe and Japan are unlikely to counter population decline and population ageing over the next half century. ” – http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/ageing/replacement-chap1.pdf
Or the LIBE plan ?
“On Friday, the European Parliament’s Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice, and Home Affairs (LIBE) adopted a report on the amendment of the Dublin Agreement, which regulates the EU’s Common Asylum System, which would see all member states forced to accept asylum seekers against the will of their people and for funds to be withheld from nations that refuse to comply.”
Yep just a conspiracy theory. Or Orban’s statements?
” in Europe in the future a permanent and mandatory migrant relocation quota mechanism will be established, with no upper limit on numbers: the mandatory relocation quota,” Mr. Orbán told press.”
Hungary’s far-right Prime Minister Viktor Orbán claimed the population of Europe is being replaced and that financial speculators like US billionaire George Soros are hoping to profit from the ‘ruination’ of the continent. In a discussion on the growing number of migrants flooding into Balkan countries on public Kossuth Radio on Friday, Orbán warned that Europe was seeing a new wave of migration. He claimed it was necessary to fight Soros and his ‘army’ to prevent a ‘multicultural Europe’ because ‘we do not want to mix with others.’- https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5843911/Hungarys-PM-Viktor-Orb-n-claims-population-Europe-replaced.html
Or statements by S Jean Claude Junker, EU Chairman:
“Claiming that the continent “will clearly need immigration in the coming decades”, Junker said EU nations “have to provide [Africans] who want to come, and are able to come, and whose situation makes it possible for them to come, with legal paths to get to Europe”
Tis a conspiracy theory say the leftists, tee hee.
Or the statements by George Soros?
The lack of a unified European policy towards asylum and migration has allowed member states to act selfishly and irresponsibly. Frontline countries like Greece and Italy are neglecting to provide adequate reception and asylum processing [are REFUSING to be NEGRO-SEEDED], while others, like Hungary, are sealing their borders to keep out those in need [WHO have NO RIGHT WHATSOEVER to be there]
The chaos created by this lack of coordination has made the influx of refugees seem like an intractable problem. [NO, it is outright GENOCIDE of the European People] It has precipitated panic and steered public opinion against the refugees — so much so that we risk forgetting that the refugees are the victims here.
Oh that’s just funny old George, he doesn’t matter, Tee Hee – laugh the Lefties.
Because leftists call this a conspiracy theory in article after article, that makes it true, and if you try to cite Breitbart , DailyMail, or other regular sites to the contrary they say “ILLEGAL USE OF RIGHT WING SITE”
Let’s not forget the DEMOCRATIC position to exterminate the white race in America through Open Borders, NO VOTING ID requirements, NO building of a border wall, recognition of Anchor Babies and granting them welfare against the 14th amendment, defunding of ICE as a criminal organization, BALLOT DUMPING now legal in CAlifornia, AND pushing for socialism.
No great replacement push in America it’s just a conspiracy theory? ARE YOU NUTS?
When a user in december tried to change “conspiracy theory” to “sociopolitical theory” they banned him, and placed the page under PROTECTED status. Meaning, good luck changing their lies. The user responded thusly:
Then the ADMIN destroyed the new page I created which DID NOT CONFLICT with the conspiracy page. No for Wikileaks THE TRUTH IS NOT ALLOWED.
Claiming that the continent “will clearly need immigration in the coming decades”, Junker said EU nations “have to provide [Africans] who want to come, and are able to come, and whose situation makes it possible for them to come, with legal paths to get to Europe”
‘Soros Plan’ to flood the continent with an unlimited number of third-world migrants.
On Friday, the European Parliament’s Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice, and Home Affairs (LIBE) adopted a report on the amendment of the Dublin Agreement, which regulates the EU’s Common Asylum System, which would see all member states forced to accept asylum seekers against the will of their people and for funds to be withheld from nations that refuse to comply.
“The musket is not only primed but loaded: in Europe in the future a permanent and mandatory migrant relocation quota mechanism will be established, with no upper limit on numbers: the mandatory relocation quota,” Mr. Orbán told press.
He said that “the political forces intent on creating a United States of Europe have been deliberately transporting to Europe – and will continue to transport – multitudes of people from other cultures” in the service of their ultimate goals, due to a “definite underlying attitude that, in a United States of Europe, nations and their Christian character are more of a drawback than a benefit”.
Kalergi called the concept of a “Pan Europe” or “Pan Europe-ism” the meaning of “Unification of all nations of Europe under one single state” with the intention that continental Europe should be changed by the integration of different foreign races and cultures. In this way a cosmopolitan Europe would be created, multi-cultural, multi-raced, eventually all becoming mestizos, or a mixed people, all with low intellect, easy to be ruled over by Jewish “supremacy.”
This was added to the “talk” page citing extensive examples that this is NOT a conspiracy theory. Will they change it? Doubtful. It is a Jewish-CIA conspiracy (a real one!) to mind control the population of the USA and deny them FACTS
The garbage they posted:
I called the Admin who banned me SCUM. Here is my open response to Wikipedia:
== You Should All Be Ashamed of What you have Done Here ==
I wanted to tell you how horribly you all are. Let’s review.
1) You cite NO EVIDENCE that this is a conspiracy theory
2) You don’t create an article that has “conspiracy theory” as a section, no YOU MUST PUT IT IN THE TITLE
3) You refute evidence to the contrary calling it “right wing sources” Then you refute evidence to the contrary which are completely neutral sources
4) You put in a FORCED FORWARDING so that people who search “great replacement” MUST end up on the conspiracy page
5) You DISALLOW the creation of a “Great Replacement” page to give the evidence and support for that, all clearly cited and referenced by neutral sources.
6) YOU put a LOCK on the discussion and refuse to allow it to face the light of day. I thought the truth could handle being discussed that only NON TRUTHS needed protection
What do we call this behaviour of FORCING NON TRUTH down the throats of people? I call that DIS INFORMATION. I call that COMMUNIST and EVIL. And that’s exactly what all of you are. Evil people who insist ON THEIR POINT OF VIEW with ZERO FACTS and SUPPRESS actual truth. It’s reprehensible, it’s disgusting, and you should all be very ashamed.
I requested an UNBLOCK and they refused saying I had been making a personal attack. Well Duh. How about their personal attack by being communists and censoring the truth? Nope thats A-OK
Then they replied thusly:
Wikipedia is not a platform for original research, and these sources are not reliable. Attempting to create a WP:POVFORK (as you did here) based on this original research and dubious, cherry-picked sources is not appropriate. Grayfell (talk) 20:47, 16 March 2019 (UTC
My sources? Direct Link to the UN itself! Nope not reliable. What a bunch of commie peckers!
If you want to talk about a Point of View violation, that’s calling the Great Replacement a conspiracy. Of course, at Wikipedia, you won’t ever win even if you are correct and follow all their policies. They are communist CIA criminals through and through. And have been for many years.
Respectful Editing, Sources, “Conspiracy Theory”, and the Deliberateness of the Replacement
I started a new section instead of getting us tangled in endless sub-comments below; also, some of this is getting cut off due to some graphical error, so please open up to the editing page to read the full thing.
First of all, I think there should be a note about respectful editing. If you look below, I commented on one editor who claimed another editor was “promoting white supremacist conspiracy theories” which was a blatant attack on the editor who had, in actuality, offered substantive, sourced comments on how to improve this article (That’s not even to mention the fact that nowhere in this article is it referred to as a white supremacist theory.). Likewise, when I edited this article a few weeks ago, I was greeted with a rude message from an anonymous editor saying, “Any further editing as a ‘conspiracy’ contrary to current demographic trends shown in Europe will result in a ban of account” (His account is here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:188.8.131.52). *Just while I was writing this, I just got a notification that I was suspended for “sock-puppetry” despite the fact that this is the only account I own.* This is a controversial issue, but this all against Wikipedia guidelines and is exactly the kind of shameless bias that worries some people about trusting Wikipedia in the first place.
Second, some of these sources are either poor or biased. For instance, The Atlantic is a notoriously left-wing publication (along with The New Yorker and The Independent as well), so it’s a given they’d call this a “conspiracy theory”. Right-wing publications, when speaking about this issue in the US, don’t refer to it as a conspiracy theory (https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/01/immigration-why-we-panic-birth-rates-assimilation/). Even if those magazines can be trusted, the SPLC cannot be used as an objective source given recent law suits won by Maajid Nawaz and others (https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2018/06/maajid-nawaz-v-splc/562646/; the SPLC says here in this article that they promote ‘pluralism’ which could explain their lack of objectivity about this replacement issue); even people who support the SPLC would probably admit it has a definite left-wing bias. One gets the impression by reading this article that some of the editors did a reverse search trying to find instances of it being called a conspiracy theory, picked whatever sources worked, then plugged them in. I understand the rational behind that (how else do you research this kind of thing?), but the problem is you’re going to find lots of instances of people calling it a “conspiracy theory” and very few articles from good sources going out of their way to say “it’s not a conspiracy theory”. The basis for what is a conspiracy theory just must be the data, which several other editors have offered and can be found at various institutions that predict the average percentage of the white population in Europe in the coming years.
Another question that comes up in looking at this theory is the question: Is this being deliberately done, and is there data for this? I have offered some UN data in my comments below about this (but, even then, the UN wishes to encourage immigration for non-conspiratorial purposes and is open about it; thus, I don’t think it can properly be defined as a ‘conspiracy’ theory), but many mentions of this subject don’t speak about any kind of intentional replacement of whites. They simply, in a broad sense, refer to low white birth rates, miscegenation, and immigration. Some such places are:
–> https://www.amren.com/features/2018/09/anti-racism-the-trojan-horse-for-the-great-replacement/ This legal framework, coupled with several decades of free immigration, has allowed what appears to be the ultimate goal of anti-racism: the great replacement. That expression, which we owe to Renaud Camus, refers to the bio-cultural change that mass immigration inflicts on the French people. While the cultural identity of the French people changes under the effect of Islamization, the French racial or genetic identity changes under the effect of miscegenation. Another term for this process could be genocide by substitution. In addition to the slow death of the French people, the migratory invasion brings in its wake all kinds of delinquent behavior that is not kept in check by the judicial system and that culminates in Islamic terrorism.
[NOTE: See how the Leftist Admins at Wikipedia DISCREDIT articles by calling them WHITE SUPREMACIST when they are actually WHITE NATIONALIST. Their feeble brains are INCAPABLE of LOGICAL THOUGHT. See Bolded Text Below]
One only need to read the subtitle for this best-seller: https://www.amazon.com/Death-West-Populations-Immigrant-Civilization/dp/0312302592
You are suggesting American Renaissance (magazine) as a source? It is a “white supremacist online publication“, owned by the disreputable New Century Foundation. They are about as reliable on sociological topics as the Völkischer Beobachter. Dimadick (talk) 07:30, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
- I’m not claiming they’re a good source in the sense that I’d go to them for objective information. However, when it comes to what this theory means and how it’s defined, we have to look at how the word is used in action, and I’m showing you a few examples here of people using this theory without reference to anything being done deliberately. Philosophered (talk) 07:38, 5 February 2019 (UTC)Philosophered
- If you’re siding with a white supremacist source over mainstream ones, you’re siding with white supremacists to promote their conspiracy theories. The only reasons to do that are either:
- – You don’t understand that white supremacists are wrong
- – You are a white supremacist.
- Either way, OP blocked. Ian.thomson (talk) 15:45, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
Why are there no demographic statistics referenced on this article that highlights demographic changes?
I think a lot of the above deliberation about whether or not to label it as “conspiracy theory” can be put to rest simply by stating what population changes are happening in France. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.108.40.206 (talk) 17:59, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
- This article is not about demographic shifts in France. This article is about a conspiracy theory that postulates a clandestine plan and an ulterior motive to explain demographic changes.
- You would need an independent reliable source discussing The Great Replacement conspiracy theory to add any material to the article. – SummerPhDv2.0 19:36, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
- Without references to what’s actually going on, the article reads as if there was no population replacement happening, while reputable research says otherwise. I suggest some sort of exceprt from this Pew report is somehow included in the link.2406:3400:319:C860:7114:1D1F:523:4C63 (talk) 14:22, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
This is NOT a conspiracy it is a real theory supported by statistics and clear evidence. Calling it a conspiracy is nutters.
See the Update to this Article: WikiStalinskia : All the True As We Say It Is Or You Die