Adolf Hitler. Most evil person in the world. How can anyone suggest that Hitler might NOT be the goon thuggee that we’ve been told. The concentration camps, the gassings, the roundups. The Fascism.
Everything you have been told about Hitler is pretty much a bold face lie, written by the victors to make him seem as evil as possible. But it just isn’t true. For example, one might believe that Hitler bombed civilians first in the war. Churchill was elected prime minister on May 10, 1940 and by May 11 he sent bombers to bomb German cities murdering civilians. Hitler did not retaliate and bomb civilians until the bombing of Coventry in November 1940. He first tried to settle the war with Churchill diplomatically. Now if China were bombing American cities do you think the USA would wait four months to strike back? Yet we say Hitler was evil and not Churchill.
What about Hitler not letting the Jews leave Germany and putting the in concentration camps? Again not true. In fact he had a specific plan to let any Jew leave: In 1941 and again in 1942, the German Gestapo offered all European Jews transit to Spain, if they would relinquish all their property in Germany and Occupied France; on condition that:
a) none of the deportees travel from Spain to Palestine; and
b) all the deportees be transported from Spain to the USA or British colonies, and there to remain; with entry visas to be arranged by the Jews living there; and
c) $1000.00 ransom for each family to be furnished by the Agency, payable upon the arrival of the family at the Spanish border at the rate of 1000 families daily. (in other words, it was FREE this was simply a deposit)
The Zionist leaders in Switzerland and Turkey received this offer with the clear understanding that the exclusion of Palestine as a destination for the deportees was based on an agreement between the Gestapo and the Palestinian leadership. But they refused it declaring that only Palestine could be considered as a destination. As Palestine was not their land and the Palestinians did not want the Jews there, there is no way Hitler could have agreed to such terms. As a consequence, the Jews languished in work camps unable to leave.
Granted the Fascism, the statism, seizing all power to make laws through the enabling act, all of that happened and was a negative thing for Germany. The enabling act was Germany’s NDAA bill or Patriot act overturning the constitution. But Bush and Obama did the same thing and we don’t demonize them. In fact, does not America with its fraud two party system and the fraud Ron Paul fiasco prove we are in the same statist hell as Hitler? While the rise of a totalitarian state was terrible and wrong at the beginning Hitler was fighting for many things we in America should be fighting for now. There are many lessons we can learn from how Hitler pulled his nation out of a national depression like America is in today.
To really understand Hitler you have to remove the many lies and look more objectively at what really was going at the time. One fundamental issue was Hitler correctly recognized the disparate control that Jews had taken of key parts of his society in finance, media, and education and the perverted world view they were pushing. He also recognized correctly that they were acting as a fifth column inside Germany, people working for their own interests not the interests of Germany. This is quite similar to the neocons who have hijacked America into an endless war and terrorist state. Most hold dual American – Israeli citizenship.
Hitler was first recognized by handlers as post WWI he loved war and ended up in a special troop that practiced giving passionate speeches. Hitler was recognized as an effective tool by the “secret hand”
But Hitler sided with communist factions in the Beer Hall Putsch and ultimately was arrested and jailed. After the writing of his book Mein Kampf what was needed was money to form a new movement. Hitler had the best way to coerce a starving Germany to join, he provided help and food. Where did the money come from? From American Jewish Bankers via Paul Warburg.
Hitler didn’t care where the money came from only that he had it. But the bigger question is why did the Jews fund Hitler? Because the Jewish bankers wanted war and would profit heavily from it. This theme keeps coming up over and over since Napoleon and the Rothschilds.
It was determined that Warburg who spoke German should travel to Germany and ask Hitler how much money he needed to overthrow the state. The only stipulation was that Hitler adopts “an aggressive foreign policy.”
“Warburg” details five meetings with Hitler between 1929 and 1933. The first took place in a beer cellar and Hitler calculated his needs on the back of a paper plate. About $25 million was transferred. This was extremely important in the depth of the depression because the Nazis provided food and shelter to their supporters.
Today the USA funds Five Billion to the Ukranians to start war. Times haven’t changed.
People argue that Hitler is indefensible because of the gassing of six million jews but that claim is looking more and more false when you investigate it scientifically. The most likely story is that jews were removed to work camps while Hitler argues endlessly with the zionist leaders about where to repatriate them. But when Allied planes bombed the supply lines, these concentrated people ran out of food and supplies. Even the main Germany army ran out of supplies. So towards the end of the war everyone in Germany was starving but the work camps had it the worst.
To understand Hitler, you must examine his motivations his goals, and most importantly his accomplishments. He lifted Germany out of a horrific inflationary depression – exactly what the US faces today.
Hitler wasn’t perfect of course. He did make many mistakes. His passage of the enabling act (like Bush passing the Patriot Act) shredded the constitution and the power of congress. His move to centralist economic planning destroyed the booming economy. He became a dictator. But the truth was he was actually a slave, fearing the now powerful Himmler and the SS (see Hitler Hated Socialism and Supported Homosexuals) after his 2 inner core leaders – Rohm and Hess – left, Rohm because of his homosexuality and Hess to try to convince England for peace, Hitler was left weak and powerless to change course.
While much is made of the attack on the Jews, at that time there were no passport and people traveled freely, so Germany’s jews were much like America’s illegal mexicans today. They were living there but they had simply sneaked into the country from outside and not assimilated as Germans. And remember, America did the same thing to Japanese descended American citizens, and put them in concentration camps under terrible conditions as well. If America had lost the war and American supply lines for food had been destroyed by aircraft, America would have had piles of Japanese bodies in their concentration camps not the Germans.
Even the notion from the ten commandments movie that Jews were slaves in Egypt is called into serious question by modern archaeologists – “Most archeologists now believe that the Jews were never in Egypt and that the Jewish exodus is a hoax from start to finish, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Exodus – “Many archaeologists,including Israel Finkelstein, Ze’ev Herzog and William G. Dever, regard the Exodus as non-historical, at best containing a small germ of truth. In his book, The Bible Unearthed, Finkelstein points to the appearance of settlements in the central hill country around 1200 BCE, recognized by most archaeologists as the earliest settlements of the Israelites.”
Similarly in “Jesus Last of the Pharohs” the argument is discussed that it is quite possible that the Jews were the Hyksos, who were Rulers over Egypt for a time, not slaves.
Here is Leucter’s conculsion looking for evidence of gas chambers “In all the author’s investigations in Poland, Germany and Austria, hardware or constuction remarkable to gas chambers has never been found. There are no stacks of the necessary height, no ventilators, no gas generators, no intake air preheaters, no special paint or sealants on walls, floors or ceilings, no safety devices for the operators, and no coherent design consistently utilized throughout the alleged gas chambers. It is inconceivable that the Germans, having the highly developed technology utilized on the delousing chambers, would never have applied this technology to the alleged execution gas chambers.”
This on top of the fact there there were no poison residues found in the walls of supposed gas chambers.
The issue at stake is very hard for the Jewish mainstream to digest because it means that hundreds of books, speaches, talks, and first hand accounts are not true. While the Nurenberg confessions were extracted under torture and many of the documents were clearly falsified by the torturers what of the first hand accounts?
Jews admitting to lieing about gas chambers
(excerpt from A Prominent False Witness: Elie Wiesel By Robert Faurisson)
In 1954 French scholar Germaine Tillion analyzed the “gratuitous lie” with regard to the German concentration camps. She wrote: [“Le Système concentrationnaire allemand [1940-1944],” Revue d’histoire de la Deuxième Guerre mondiale, July 1954, p. 18, n. 2.]
Those persons [who gratuitously lie] are, to tell the truth, much more numerous than people generally suppose, and a subject like that of the concentration camp world — well designed, alas, to stimulate sado-masochistic imaginings — offered them an exceptional field of action. We have known numerous mentally damaged persons, half swindlers and half fools, who exploited an imaginary deportation; we have known others of them — authentic deportees — whose sick minds strove to go even beyond the monstrosities that they had seen or that people said had happened to them. There have been publishers to print some of their imaginings, and more or less official compilations to use them, but publishers and compilers are absolutely inexcusable, since the most elementary inquiry would have been enough to reveal the imposture.
Tillion lacked the courage to give examples and names. But that is usually the case. People agree that there are false gas chambers that tourists and pilgrims are encouraged to visit, but they do not tell us where. They agree that there are false “eyewitnesses,” but in general they name only Martin Gray, the well-known swindler, at whose request Max Gallo, with full knowledge of what he was doing, fabricated the bestseller For Those I Loved.
Jean-François Steiner is sometimes named as well. His bestselling novel Treblinka (1966) was presented as a work of which the accuracy of every detail was guaranteed by oral or written testimony. In reality it was a fabrication attributable, at least in part, to the novelist Gilles Perrault. [Le Journal du Dimanche, March 30, 1985, p. 5.] Marek Halter, for his part, published his La Mémoire d’Abraham in 1983; as he often does on radio, he talked there about his experiences in the Warsaw ghetto. However, if we are to believe an article by Nicolas Beau that is quite favorable to Halter, [Le Journal du Dimanche, March 30, 1985, p. 5.] little Marek, about three years old, and his mother left Warsaw not in 1941 but in October of 1939, before the establishment of the ghetto there by the Germans. Halter’s book is supposed to have been actually written by a ghost writer, Jean-Noël Gurgan.
Filip Müller is the author of Eyewitness Auschwitz: Three Years in the Gas Chambers, [Published by Stein and Day (New York). Paperback edition of 1984. (xii + 180 pages.) With a foreword by Yehuda Bauer of the Institute of Contemporary Jewry, Hebrew University, Jerusalem.] which won the 1980 prize of the International League against Racism and Anti-Semitism (LICRA). This nauseous best-seller is actually the work of a German ghost writer, Helmut Freitag, who did not hesitate to engage in plagiarism. [Carlo Mattogno, Auschwitz: un caso di plagio, Parma (Italy): 1986. See also: C. Mattogno, “Auschwitz: A Case of Plagiarism,” The Journal of Historical Review, Spring 1990, pp. 5-24.] The source of the plagiarism is Auschwitz: A Doctor’s Eyewitness Account, another best-seller made up out of whole cloth and attributed to Miklos Nyiszli. [Paperback edition, 1961, and later, published by Fawcett Crest (New York).]
Thus a whole series of works presented as authentic documents turns out to be merely compilations attributable to various ghost writers: Max Gallo, Gilles Perrault, Jean-Noël Gurgan (?), and Helmut Freitag, among others.
We would like to know what Germaine Tillion thinks about Elie Wiesel today. With him the lie is certainly not gratuitous. Wiesel claims to be full of love for humanity. However, he does not refrain from an appeal to hatred. In his opinion: [Legends of Our Time (chapter 12: “Appointment with Hate”), New York: Schocken Books, 1982, p. 142, or, New York: Avon, 1968, pp. 177-178.]
Every Jew, somewhere in his being, should set apart a zone of hate — healthy, virile hate — for what the German personifies and for what persists in the German. To do otherwise would be a betrayal of the dead.
At the beginning of 1986, 83 deputies of the German Bundestag took the initiative of proposing Wiesel for the Nobel Peace Prize. This would be, they said, “a great encouragement to all who are active in the process of reconciliation.” [The Week in Germany (published in New York by the German government in Bonn), Jan. 31, 1986, p. 2.] That is what might be called “going from National Socialism to national masochism.”
Jimmy Carter needed a historian to preside over the President’s Commission on the Holocaust. As Dr. Arthur Butz said so well, he chose not a historian but a “histrion”: Elie Wiesel. Even the newspaper Le Monde, in the article mentioned above, was obliged to refer to the histrionic trait that certain persons deplore in Wiesel:
Naturally, even among those who approve of the struggle of this American Jewish writer, who was discovered by the Catholic François Mauriac, some reproach him for having too much of a tendency to change the Jewish sadness into “morbidity” or to become the high priest of a “planned management of the Holocaust.”
As Jewish writer Leon A. Jick has written: “The devastating barb, ‘There is no business like SHOAH-business’ is, sad to say, a recognizable truth.” [“The Holocaust: Its Use and Abuse Within the American Public,” Yad Vashem Studies (Jerusalem), 1981, p. 316.]
Elie Wiesel issues alarmed and inflammatory appeals against Revisionist authors. He senses that things are getting out of hand. It is going to become more and more difficult for him to maintain the mad belief that the Jews were exterminated or were subjected to a policy of extermination, especially in so-called gas chambers. Serge Klarsfeld has admitted that real proofs of the existence of the gas chambers have still not yet been published. He promises proofs. 
On the scholarly plane, the gas chamber myth is finished. To tell the truth, that myth breathed its last breath several years ago at the Sorbonne colloquium in Paris (June 29-July 2, 1982), at which Raymond Aron and François Furet presided. What remains is to make this news known to the general public. However, for Elie Wiesel it is of the highest importance to conceal that news. Thus all the fuss in the media, which is going to increase: the more the journalists talk, the more the historians keep quiet.
But there are historians who dare to raise their voices against the lies and the hatred. That is the case with Michel de Boüard, wartime member of the Resistance, deportee to Mauthausen, member of the Committee for the History of the Second World War from 1945 to 1981, and a member of the Institut de France. In a poignant interview in 1986, he courageously acknowledged that in 1954 he had vouched for the existence of a gas chamber at Mauthausen where, it finally turns out, there never was one.  ”
On November 23, 1978, the French historian René Rémond declared: “As for the [Nazi] gas chambers, I am ready to follow you[they didn’t exist]; as for the genocide, I have the deep conviction that Nazism in itself was sufficiently perverse so that this genocide was part of its motivations and its actions, but I recognize that I have no scientific evidence for this genocide.”
What of the Six Million Claim?
Let’s take one falsehood. Six million jews died in gas chambers – the definition of the holocaust. The Germans kept meticulous records of deaths in the camps. Based on the Bad Arolsen documents, the Nazi documents captured by the Russians, and their own records, in 1984 the Red Cross has estimated the TOTAL Red Cross estimate number of deaths for all prisoners, including but not limited to Jews, in Nazi concentration camps to be 262,077. The authenticity of the estimates was verified in the trial of Ernst Zundel by the director of the International Tracing Service, see http://www.zundelsite.org/english/101/english1013.html and http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=120 and http://www.zundelsite.org/english/dsmrd/dsmrd10biedermann.html. These are records which have been reviewed, debated, and found to be legitimate. This information – original German records seized at the liberation of germany – was kept in Russian archives and only released in the 1990s.
But it gets worse. The official number of deaths at Auschwitz even according to zionists had to be revised on the very plaque mentioning it – from 4 million to 1.5 million.
Source: The French War Crime Research Office, Doc. 31, 1945.
Source: Also cited by the French War Crime Research Office.
Source: Cited in the book Auschwitz Doctor by Miklos Nyiszli. It has since been proven that this book is a fraud and the “doctor” was never even at Auschwitz, even though the book is often cited by historians.
5,000,000 to 5,500,000
Source: Cited in 1945 at the trial of Auschwitz commander Rudolf Höss, based on his confession which was written in English, a language he never spoke.
Source: Cited on April 20, 1978 by the French daily, Le Monde. Also cited on January 23, 1995 by the German daily Die Welt. By September 1, 1989, Le Monde reduced the figure to 1,433,000.
Source: In 1945 this figure was cited by another witness at the aforementioned Höss trial.
Source: Cited by a Soviet document of May 6, 1945 and officially acknowledged by the Nuremberg War Crimes trial. This figure was also reported in The New York Times on April 18, 1945, although 50 years later on January 26, 1995, The New York Times and The Washington Post slashed the figure to 1,500,000 citing new findings by the Auschwitz Museum officials. In fact, the figure of 4,000,000 was later repudiated by the Auschwitz museum officials in 1990 but the figure of 1,500,000 victims was not formally announced by Polish President Lech Walesa until five years after the Auschwitz historians had first announced their discovery.
Source: Cited in the 1991 edition of the Dictionary of the French Language and by Claude Lanzmann in 1980 in his introduction to Filip Muller’s book, Three Years in an Auschwitz Gas Chamber.
Source: Cited in a forced confession by Rudolf Höss, the Auschwitz commander who said this was the number of those who had died at Auschwitz prior to Dec. 1, 1943. Later cited in the June 7, 1993 issue of Heritage, the most widely read Jewish newspaper in California, even though three years previously the authorities at the Auschwitz museum had scaled down the figure to a minimum of 1,100,000 and a maximum of 1,500,000. (see below).
Source: Cited by Rudolf Vrba (an author of various fraudulent accounts of events he claims to have witnessed at Auschwitz) when he testified on July 16, 1981 for the Israeli government’s war crimes trial of former SS official Adolf Eichmann.
Source: Cited by Leon Poliakov (1951) writing in Harvest of Hate; Georges Wellers, writing in 1973 in The Yellow Star at the Time of Vichy; and Lucy Dawidowicz, writing in 1975 in The War Against the Jews.
2,000,000 to 4,000,000
Source: Cited by Yehuda Bauer in 1982 in his book, A History of the Holocaust. However, by 1989 Bauer revised his figure to 1,600,000.
Source: This is a 1989 revision by Yehuda Bauer of his earlier figure in 1982 of 2,000,000 to 4,000,000, Bauer cited this new figure on September 22, 1989 in The Jerusalem Post, at which time he wrote “The larger figures have been dismissed for years, except that it hasn’t reached the public yet.”
Source: In 1995 this was the number of Auschwitz deaths announced by Polish President Lech Walesa as determined by those at the Auschwitz museum. This number was inscribed on the monument at the Auschwitz camp at that time, thereby “replacing” the earlier 4,000,000 figure that had been formally repudiated (and withdrawn from the monument) five years earlier in 1990. At that time, on July 17, 1990 The Washington Times reprinted a brief article from The London Daily Telegraph citing the “new” figure of 1,500,000 that had been determined by the authorities at the Auschwitz museum. This new figure was reported two years later in a UPI report published in the New York Post on March 26, 1992. On January 26, 1995 both The Washington Post and The New York Times cited this 1,500,000 figure as the new “official” figure (citing the Auschwitz Museum authorities).
Source: This is a 1983 figure cited by Georges Wellers who (as noted previously) had determined, writing in 1973, that some 2,000,000 had died.
Source: This figure was cited on September 1, 1989 by the French daily, Le Monde, which earlier, on April 20, 1978, had cited the figure at 4,000,000.
Source: In the book, The Destruction of the European Jews, by Raul Hilberg (1985).
1,100,000 to 1,500,000
Source: Sources for this estimate are Yisrael Gutman and Michael Berenbaum in their 1984 book, Anatomy of the Auschwitz Death Camp. This estimate was later also cited by Walter Reich, former director of the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum, writing in The Washington Post on September 8, 1998. The upper figure of 1,500,000 is (the new) “official” figure as now inscribed at Auschwitz, with the earlier figure of 4,000,000 having been removed from the memorial at the site of the former concentration camp.
Source: Jean-Claude Pressac, writing in his 1989 book Auschwitz: Technique and Operation of the Gas Chambers. This is interesting since he wrote his book to repudiate so-called “Holocaust deniers” who were called that precisely because they had questioned the numbers of those who had died at Auschwitz.
Source: Reported on August 3, 1990 11, by Aufbau, a Jewish newspaper in New York.
800,000 to 900,000
Source: Reported by Gerald Reitlinger in his book, The Final Solution.
775,000 to 800,000
Source: Jean-Claude Pressac’s revised figure, put forth in his 1993 book, The Crematoria of Auschwitz: The Mass Murder’s Machinery, scaling down his earlier claim of 1,000,000 dead.
630,000 to 710,000
Source: In 1994 Pressac scaled his figure down somewhat further; this is the figure cited in the German language translation of Pressac’s 1993 book originally published in French. Again, this is substantially less than Pressac’s 1989 figure of 1,000,000.
135,000 to 140,000
Source: This is an estimate based on documents held by the International Tracing Service of the Red Cross. It is known that International Tracing Service has a complete set of registration documents. This is thought to include a complete set of roll-call data which includes twice daily tallies of those who died. Although the International Tracing Service of the Red Cross has such records, they have never officially published an accurate count of those who died, or even an accurate report as to exactly which documents they hold. However, totals from these records have been obtained by various interested parties.
The estimate of 135,000 is roughly corroborated by the “Auschwitz death books.” The death books themselves are wartime German camp records, which were captured by the Soviets towards the end of the war, and hidden in Soviet achieves, until released to the Red Cross in 1989.
The death books consist of 46 volumes which document each death at Auschwitz (each death certificate consists of the deceased person’s full name, profession and religion, date and place of birth, pre-Auschwitz residence, parents’ names, time of death, and cause of death as determined by a camp physician). The records for the most important years, 1942 and 1943, are almost complete (there are also a few volumes for the year 1941, but none for the year 1944 or January 1945 (when Auschwitz was evacuated)).
The Auschwitz death books contain the death certificates of some 69,000 individuals, of whom about 30,000 were listed as Jews. You may view various eThe above mentioned, ever declining numbers of alleged dead at Auschwitz, are graphically illustrated by the following pictures of plaques from the camp. The first is the plaque that was on display at the Auschwitz camp from 1948 until 1989 (note the “4 million” victims). The second is the plaque currently on display at Auschwitz. Note the dramatically reduced number of victims, now only 1.5 million
Americas lurch to Anacro-Capitalism/Facism
America is now MORE of a fascist state now with less freedom than ever was under Hitler’s Germany. The president has been authorized by the senate to take any american away without trial and execute them. The law passed states that even if found NOT GUILTY by a trial the president has the right to keep them incarcerated.
At first glance, I had some doubts about all the hoopla over the pending Defense Authorization Act and claims that it was essentially a declaration of war on American citizens, under the guise of national security and annual defense appropriations.
Then I read the bill and connected the dots that every American must connect immediately.
The treasonous text in that bill reads as follows; (pay close attention to the areas in bold)
(a) In General- Congress affirms that the authority of the President to use all necessary and appropriate force  pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107-40) includes the authority for the Armed Forces of the United States to detain covered persons (as defined in subsection (b) pending disposition under the law of war.
(b) Covered Persons- A covered person under this section is any person as follows:
(1) A person who planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored those responsible for those attacks.
(2) A person who was a part of or substantially supported al-Qaeda, the Taliban, or associated forces that are engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners, including any person who has committed a belligerent act or has directly supported such hostilities in aid of such enemy forces.
Before directly addressing this text and in an effort to fully grasp how this text is an act of treason against the American people, there are a few fundamental facts one must understand.
• Our Armed Services exist for one reason alone, at the service of the people, to protect and defend the Unites States, The U.S. Constitution and the American people against all enemies, both foreign and domestic. This is the primary purpose and function of our federal government.
• The Laws of War as written by William Winthrop, also known as Military Law or the Uniform Code of Military Justice, operate entirely separate and independent from the Civil Justice System, including the suspension of fundamental Constitutional Rights for both members of the Military and those designated enemy combatants.
• Following Bill Clinton’s lead in 1996 and immediately upon seizing office, the Obama Administration issued a Homeland Security Report directly identifying members of the US Military, Veterans and American citizens with dissenting views towards the current direction of our country as “potential domestic terrorists” and “right-wing extremists.”
• The Obama Administration has been cross-training state and local law enforcement agencies on dealing with “urban warfare” aimed at so-called “right-wing extremists” which is now defined as anyone opposed to Global Governance and national socialism.
• American courts no longer enforce the law or the Constitution. Instead, they make up the law as they go via unbridled interpretation powers exceeding their constitutional authority, all in the name of “social justice,” not to be confused with actual justice.
As a result, the language in Sections 1031 and 1032 of the Defense Authorization Act amount to treason against the American people, as an open-ended power of the Executive Branch to indefinitely detain, incarcerate and interrogate American citizens on the basis of suspicion or accusations without even bring any criminal charges, much less providing due process of the law.
What if the person sitting in the Oval Office is a foreign born domestic enemy of the United States? — What if the Administration is willing to use the full power of the federal government and the U.S. Military to force its political will upon the people, deeming every dissenter as a “potential domestic terrorist?” — What if the American courts make up laws as they go without any regard for written laws or the U.S. Constitution?
Guess what? That’s exactly what we have today!
Ok Back to Hitler. The first PRINCIPLE as a intelligent being you should recognize is this – “The TRUTH can withstand the LIGHT of DAY”. What this means is that attempts to squash debate, hide facts, jail dissenters is a CLEAR INDICATION of supression of truth. And what do we have going on in Europe today? Anyone questioning the holocaust is thrown in JAIL. Any scientist investigating the Holocaust (see http://www.ihr.org/books/leuchter/leuchter.toc.html) is arrested and tried and thrown away without a fair trial.
“Fred A. Leuchter is a 46-year old engineer who lives in Boston. He is a specialist in planning and building execution facilities for American penitentiaries. One of his achievements was the modernization of the execution gas chamber in the penitentiary at Jefferson City, Missouri.
Ernst Zündel is a 50-year-old German who lives in Toronto, where he had a brilliant career as a graphic artist and advertising man, until he was boycotted because of his Revisionist opinions. Since then, he has spent almost all his time struggling against lies about the “Holocaust” I have helped him in this struggle, especially during the two trials which a Canadian Jewish organization initiated against him in 1985 and 1988.
Zündel’s first trial lasted seven weeks and ended with his being sentenced to 15 months in prison for “publication of false news.” The verdict was thrown out on appeal because of serious errors made by District Court Judge Hugh Locke.
The second trial lasted four months. This time Ernst Zündel was sentenced to nine months in prison by District Court Judge Ron Thomas. This second verdict, too, may eventually be successfully appealed on the same grounds.
In 1988, Ernst Zündel asked Fred Leuchter to visit Poland to examine “the alleged execution gas chambers” in the three concentration camps at Auschwitz, Birkenau and Majdanek. The conclusion of the first Leuchter Report was quite clear: no such gas chambers ever existed in those three places
In 1989, he asked Leuchter to visit West Germany and Austria to examine “the alleged execution gas chambers” at Dachau, Mauthausen and Hartheim Castle. The conclusion of the second report, as you will read below, is just as clear: no such gas chambers ever existed in those three places.
Before Ernst Zündel, Germany’s accusers never gave a thought to proving the existence of the “gas chambers.” They treated their existence as “proven.” – Fred Leuchter & Robert Faurisson (http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v10/v10p261_Leuchter.html)
According to Exterminationist Serge Klarsfeld:
It is clear that during the years after 1945 the technical aspects of the gas chambers were a subject that was neglected since no one imagined that someday we would have to prove their existence. (Le Monde Juif, January- March, 1987, p. 1)
At the Nuremberg trials, the Eichmann trial in Jerusalem, and the Frankfurt trial as well as at many other famous trials, including the Klaus Barbie trial in 1987, there was no attempt to prove this horrible accusation, which has so long weighed on the vanquished German nation. These judicial travesties were similar to the witchcraft trials, in which the accused and their defense lawyers did not question the existence of the Devil and his supernatural doings. In these modern witchcraft trials, it has been taboo to question the existence of “the gas chambers” and their supernatural accomplishments, which defy all laws of physics and chemistry.
Even Klaus Barbie’s French defense attorney, Jacques Vergés, in spite of his courage, refrained from asking for even the slightest proof of the existence of the “gas chambers” to which Klaus Barbie allegedly sent the Jewish children from their refuge in the town of Izieu, near Lyons.
In all these trials of so-called “war crimes” or “crimes against humanity,” the supposedly civilized nations have ignored the elementary rules of criminal law for nearly a half century.
“The determination of the International Military Tribunal in the judgments […] that invasions, aggressive acts, aggressive wars, crimes, atrocities or inhumane acts were planned or occurred, shall be binding on the tribunals established hereunder and shall not be questioned except insofar as the participation therein or knowledge thereof by any particular person may be concerned. Statements of the International Military Tribunal in the judgment […] constitute proof of the facts stated, in the absence of substantial new evidence to the contrary.”
From Nuremberg on, the holohoax could not be challenged in court.
To understand what I mean, let us take, for example, a crime committed in France. Let’s suppose that in this case there is a weapon, a body, and a killer (or presumed killer). Normally the French court would demand four routine reports:
A report of on-site forensic examination of the body and any suspect item;
A technical study of the weapon used to commit the crime;
An autopsy report on the victim, showing how and by what means if death occurred;
A report on the reenactment or simulation of the crime, in the presence of the accused, at the scene of the crime.
Even if the defendant has confessed, the judges never decide that further investigations need not be carried out; a confession, to have much judicial value, must be verified and confirmed.
In nearly half a century, however, no one has ever met these elementary standards, in a case which involves not just an ordinary crime perpetrated by a single person with an ordinary weapon (whether blade or bullet), but a supposedly unprecedented crime committed against millions of people with an extraordinary weapon that no judge had ever seen before: a “super gas chamber” for thousands of victims, a virtual mass-production chemical slaughterhouse!
The first trials of Germans accused of having used “gas chambers” or “gas vans” to kill people began in 1943 in the Soviet Union (trials of Kharkov and Krasnodar). They continue to this day, especially in Israel with the Demjanjuk trial. Today, after 47 years of such trials we still do not have:
A single on-site forensic examination of “gassed” bodies or “gas chambers” or “gas vans”;
A single expert report concluding that a given room or a given van was used for homicidal gassing;
A single autopsy report concluding that the victim had been killed by any type of poison gas;
A single report on the re-enactment or simulation of a gassing operation, using the thousands of victims claimed and the steps taken, and taking into account the dangerous chemicals involved.
In the course of the trial concerning the Struthof-Natzweiler camp, in Alsace, an expert study was in fact made of the “gas chamber” and of the “gassed” bodies (kept at the civilian hospital in Strasbourg), but in each case, Professor René Fabre, a toxicologist, found no traces of gas. As regards Dachau, there was in fact a kind of expert report carried out by Captain Fribourg, of the French army, but although the report concluded that it would be necessary to examine the room provisionally called the “gas chamber,” no such examination was carried out.
During his preliminary investigation in the trial of Rudolf Höss and other Auschwitz officials, examining magistrate Jan Sehn ordered the Institute for Forensic Examination, Copernic Street, Krakow, to test six zinc closures allegedly obtained from ventilation openings said to have been part of the “gas chamber” of Krematorium II in Birkenau, and also 25.5 Kilos of hair with metallic items in them. Traces of hydrocyanic acid and its compounds were found (expert reports by Dr. Jan Z. Robel, dated December 15, 1945).
There is nothing out of the ordinary in this. The Germans made frequent use of hydrocyanic acid, in the form of Zyklon B for the disinfection of premises, clothing, and personal effects. In Poland, as well as throughout wartime Europe, hair was collected, even in commercial barber shops, for use in clothing (after it was disinfected). What is paradoxical is that, despite having a forensic institute at its disposal, it appears that the Polish justice system never undertook basic, thorough research into the rooms alleged to be “execution gas chambers.” (See R. Faurisson, “Response to a Paper Historian,” The Journal of Historical Review, Spring 1986, p. 37)
Any place where the Premise is Handed to You the Truth has been abandoned
There are several cases in modern history where a Premise was handed to people as truth and all investigation began afterward. The best case of this is in 911. In the 911 official investigation, the fact that planes were actually hijacked by middle eastern extremists, and that they did hit the buildings, and that this did cause the buildings to collapse WAS NEVER QUESTIONED. In fact groups like 911 truth bring to light huge discrepencies with this premis.
But while we can take that as a clear sign of FRAUD and Propaganda from the government, we have a much harder time when the issues regarding Hitler and the Jews come to light. Why? The truth is we have been given a huge propaganda pill fed by huxter jews who reap billions off the shakedown shoa industry and with the billions they have falsely collected.
“When “The Holocaust Industry,” by Prof. Norman Finkelstein was released in the United States and Great Britain some nine months ago, representatives of the Jewish establishment evidently decided that killing it with kindness was their best strategy. The book viciously attacks them for exploiting the Holocaust for their own needs, and in order to establish a line of defense for Israel. But they decided against responding too strongly to the accusations, hoping that the storm would soon abate. The fact that the author was Jewish and a child son of Holocaust survivors undoubtedly contributed to their decision.Nevertheless, this low-profile approach is changing in the face of the book’s immense success in Germany since its release there two months ago. In a telephone interview with Ha’aretz from his home in New York, Finkelstein claims that 130,000 copies were sold in the first four weeks after the book’s German-language translation arrived in the bookshops. For comparison’s sake, after nine months on sale in the U.S. and Britain, “The Holocaust Industry” notched sales of 18,000 and 12,000, respectively.
Just what is Finkelstein claiming in the book? First, as he already makes clear in the first few paragraphs of the introduction, he differentiates between the “Nazi holocaust” – in which millions of Jews and other victims were exterminated – and “The Holocaust” – the well-known public “persona” of the event, the image that he alleges is nothing but the product of propaganda of the Jewish establishment.
Second, Finkelstein claims that the interest in the Holocaust by the Jewish-American establishment dates only to the aftermath of the Six-Day War, and in any case is not rooted in authentic Jewish motives, but from the Jewish establishment’s collaboration with the interests of the American administration. As soon as the American administration started to consider Israel a strategic asset, the Jewish establishment in the U.S. seized on the Holocaust as a line of defense for the Israeli occupation.” – Yair Sheleg on The Holocaust Industry (http://www.normanfinkelstein.com/article.php?pg=3&ar=11).
what about massacres outside of concentration camps?
One of the most famous detailed accounts of Nazi Massacre is at Babi Yar. This is what wikipedia says about Babi Yar:
“Babi Yar (Russian: Бабий Яр; Ukrainian: Бабин Яр, Babyn Yar) is a ravine in the Ukrainian capital Kiev and a site of a series of massacres carried out by the Nazis during their campaign against the Soviet Union. The most notorious and the best documented of these massacres took place on September 29–30, 1941, wherein 33,771 Jews were killed in a single operation. The decision to kill all the Jews in Kiev was made by the military governor, Major-General Kurt Eberhard, the Police Commander for Army Group South, SS-Obergruppenführer Friedrich Jeckeln, and the Einsatzgruppe C Commander Otto Rasch. It was carried out by Sonderkommando 4a soldiers, along with the aid of the SD and SS Police Battalions.”
But no graves or bodies were ever discovered at Babi Yar. Contrast that with the discovery of Russian atrocities at Vinnitsa:
In the midst of WW II, the Nazis discovered mass graves in Vinnitsa, Ukraine. In the summer of 1943 they invited an international team of forensic experts, including pathologists from Belgium, France, Netherlands, and Sweden, to examine the bodies and to conduct autopsies. They exhumed 9000+ bodies. Over 600 were identified. For a full account see http://www.davidduke.com/general/hidden-history-the-genocide-at-vinnitsa_14911.html
Babi Yar is a ravine just outside of Kiev, Ukraine, where the Nazis are alleged to have massacred and buried, according to the source, from 30,000 to 100,000 Jews. There are no mass graves at Babi Yar. There have been no excavations. There is not a shred of physical evidence of a massacre at Babi Yar. According to the holohoax, in the summer of 1943, concurrent with the international delegations at Vinnitsa not 100 miles away, the Nazis used Jewish prisoners to dig up the bodies at Babi Yar, cremate them on grates made from headstones from a nearby Jewish cemetary, and scatter the ashes in nearby farmland. Not a trace of the bodies, no bullets, no artifacts of any type, remain as evidence of the bodies, graves, or cremation. Since there are no graves there have been no excavations. Compare the evidence of the real massacre at Vinnitsa, perpetrated by the Soviet NVKD and investigated by the Germans and an international team of experts, with the non-existent evidence of the hoax massacre at Babi Yar, investigated by no one.
What does Wikipedia say about no evidence?
“For six weeks from August to September 1943, more than 300 chained prisoners were forced to exhume and burn the corpses (using local headstones as bricks to build ovens) and scatter the ashes on farmland in the vicinity. To this day many Ukrainians will not eat cabbage grown on those farms.”
I’ll say citation is needed. How about PROOF!
What of the Jews
Secondly, research supports the notion that zionist leaders were working on repatriating jews to Palestine and hence the need for roundups. Jews in Germany were a fifth column much the same way that America rounded up Japanese Americans and put them in camps. Or much the same way that modern illegal aliens from Mexico are a new anti-American fifth column. The plan was to hold them until the repatriation deal was finalized by jewish elders not execution. That many died at the end of the war when Americans bombed german supply lines which caused food disruption is a fact not openly told.
America committed the same amount of crime by rounding up and imprisoning Japanese. But we don’t consider that savage? Its ok for America but not for Germany?
Over 1% of America’s population – over 3 million people – are now in prison. These American concentration camps are hidden in remote areas and unpopulated states. We believe that people are NOT in there for political reasons but with the new TSA terrorism state, more and more are getting locked up for protesting the criminal Republocrat Homeland. Who had more locked up? America or Germany? I betcha dollars to britches its America.
The United States’ prison total constitutes a rate of 756 per 100,000 of the national population, making it pro rata by far the biggest user of prison in the world. Almost three fifths of countries (59 per cent) have rates below 150 per 100,000. The overall world prison population rate (based on 9.8 million prisoners and a world population of 6,750 million) is 145 per 100,000.
The gassings and other horror stories of WWII have yet to be substantiated and are in fact refuted by the scientific evidence.
Hitlers basic message was that a nation should be defined by its one race of people. America’s basic message has been changed to being a economic union of third world and modern people with no common race. Who got it right?
Hitler abandoned the jewish banker imposed debt and issued his own currency restoring the nation to a economic powerhouse.
America is saddled by banker debt and bailouts and is economically dying. America refuses to issue its own debt free currency.
Hitler praised science and engineering leading to many firsts – first jet engine plane, first rockets, etc.
America praises football and sports, leading to almost no inventions and scientists are abused, underpaid, and replaced by indians with fake degrees on the H-1B by the millions, all sanctioned by the state.
The more you look at it, you have to ask, in siding with the jewish bankers, did America enter world war 2 on the wrong side? Did that plant the seeds of our downfall. And if we in winning, have doomed our nation, truly isn’t that an unsettling thought?
Remember Hitler fought the Jewish run Russian Communists. America fought ALONGSIDE jewish run communism in WWII. By siding against Hitler, we brought victory to communism! In truth it was England’s blunder to defend Poland that ended us in WWII not Hitler.
Pat Buchannan writes in “Did Hitler want War” …
“Why did Warsaw not negotiate with Berlin, which was hinting at an offer of compensatory territory in Slovakia? Because the Poles had a war guarantee from Britain that, should Germany attack, Britain and her empire would come to Poland’s rescue.
But why would Britain hand an unsolicited war guarantee to a junta of Polish colonels, giving them the power to drag Britain into a second war with the most powerful nation in Europe?
Was Danzig worth a war? Unlike the 7 million Hong Kongese whom the British surrendered to Beijing, who didn’t want to go, the Danzigers were clamoring to return to Germany.
Comes the response: The war guarantee was not about Danzig, or even about Poland. It was about the moral and strategic imperative “to stop Hitler” after he showed, by tearing up the Munich pact and Czechoslovakia with it, that he was out to conquer the world. And this Nazi beast could not be allowed to do that.”
The Munich Pact gave Sudetenland, a mostly German settled area of Czechoslovakia to Germany. The treaty was Chamberlain’s masterpiece of diplomacy.
“And though Hitler had used brutal Bismarckian diplomacy, not force, Chamberlain was humiliated. The altarpiece of his career, the Munich accord, was now an object of mockery.
Made a fool of by Hitler, baited by his backbenchers, goaded by Lord Halifax, facing a vote of no confidence, on March 31, 1939, Chamberlain made the greatest blunder in British diplomatic history. He handed an unsolicited war guarantee to the Polish colonels who had just bitten off a chunk of Czechoslovakia.”
Prime Minister Chamberlain felt betrayed by the Nazi seizure of Czechoslovakia, realizing his policy of appeasement towards Hitler had failed, and began to take a much harder line against the Nazis. Among other things he immediately began to mobilize the British Empire’s armed forces on a war footing.
After this, concerns were raised with Poland. Great Britain realized that Poland (now substantially encircled by German possessions) would become the next target of Nazi expansionism, which was made apparent by the dispute over the Polish Corridor and the Free City of Danzig. This resulted in the signing of an Anglo-Polish military alliance, and consequent refusal of the Polish government to German negotiation proposals over the Polish Corridor and the status of Danzig.
Without the alliance and war guarantees of Great Britain, Danzig, another area of German People, would have been returned to Germany, ending Germany’s need for reunification and a return to a peaceful footing.
Germany offered Britain peace both after Poland fell and after France fell. Both times it was Britain who refused peace.
In the end it was Great Britain, making an absurd alliance with Poland, that led us into WWII. Hitler’s goal was only to unite his people.
Was Britain Right About Hitler Being Out to Rule the World?
Hitler offered two peace strategies for Danzig. First he offered to Annex Danzig but still allow Poland a five mile wide corridor to the sea. Why would Hitler offer this if his goal was to rule Poland? It makes no sense. His goal was clearly to unify his dispersed people because his central belief is that a county is a unified people – a lesson America could take heed to learn before it collapses.
When the Poles rejected his offer Hitler counter offered. He suggested they place Danzig under international control. This is a pretty big compromise from Hitler! But knowing that they had assurances from Great Britain the Poles stood resolute and said NO. In the end the border was violent and filled with skirmishes. Hitler was left with no solution but to invade. Was he out to rule the world? Hardly.
Who was Great Britain?
Now who exactly was Great Britain. Were they our friends? During the American Revolution Great Britain issued counterfeit American currency to debase the dollar. When the American central (jewish) bank was repealed, in short haste America found itself in the war of 1812 where the Brits burned the white house TO THE GROUND. These are our friends? The Bank of England was a Rothschild outpost and part of the family run monopoly that spanned five countries. Following that they rigged the financial panics of the early 20th century until they bought off enough politicians to recharter the foreign run central bank. To this day the true shareholders of the federal reserve IS NOT PUBLIC.
Now America has taken over Britains role as jewish enforcer of the money supply. Look at our recent wars. Saddam was going to conduct oil transactions in euros and was ousted. Libya similarly was going to conduct financial transactions for oil in Euros. They didn’t last long. And who is our biggest enemy state? Iran of course. And Iran is now exchanging Oil with Russia and China without using Dollars.
Hitler backs it with GOLD
In August 1923, Karl Helfferich proposed a plan to issue a new currency (roggenmark) backed by mortgage bonds indexed to market prices (in paper Marks) of rye grain. His plan was rejected because of the greatly fluctuating price of rye in paper Marks. The Agriculture Minister Hans Luther proposed a different plan which substituted gold for rye and a new currency, the Rentenmark, backed by bonds indexed to market prices (in paper Marks) of gold.
The gold bonds were defined at the rate of 2,790 gold Marks per kilogram of gold, which was the same definition as the pre-war goldmarks. The rentenmarks were not redeemable in gold, but were only indexed to the gold bonds. This rentenmark plan was adopted in monetary reform decrees on October 13–15, 1923 that set up a new bank, the Rentenbank controlled by Hans Luther who had become the new Finance Minister.
Will we learn our lesson?
The really painful thing we learn from history is that we are in fact the evil country – the bad guys. We exist to enforce a jewish / Rothschild banking conspiracy on the world. The euro is another central bank but because it is bureaucratically controlled, it will be dissolved and a more jewish run central bank will take over, whether that will be in dollars or another fiat version of the euro. Our financial depression is the result of a evil system spiraling out of control with looting and fraud and bailouts. This is the end game, with the jewish bankers taking down europe first hoping that both the dollar and euro won’t be destroyed in the financial war. BRIC nations sit patiently and wait for us to kill each other off. At the end of it, it wouldn’t be surprising if China and Russia joined forces to invade Europe and Europe, after 40 years of partying and socialism and 8 week vacations rather than paying for a strong defense gets its but kicked. With a newly weakened America retrenching, who will be there to save them.
Now we can learn a lot about how to save a failing country by looking to Hitler’s genius. His reissue of currency directly. His absolving jewish debt. His outlawing of jewish banks. There are many gems from Hitler we would do well to implement if we are to save ourselves from the same fate Hitler was defending himself from. We have to get over the war propaganda that Hitler commited unspeakable crimes. Its just not true. In the end war is always ugly. Americans firebombed Dresden killing hundreds of thousands of women and children. After the war ended we corralled German soldiers and slowly starved them to death even preventing their families from bringing them food. America was no saint in any of this. We need to grow up and take a closer look at the issues Hitler was fighting. They are remarkably similar to where we are today.
[Final Note. There is nothing wrong with being Jewish. But many jews force a perverted destructive world view that comes from a heightened persecution complex. Small minority sects of Jewish leaders have caused a lot of problems but they do not represent all jewish people. Examples include the Jewish push for runaway war and immigration in the U.S.A., Zionist leaders activities in WWII, Jewish spys and traitors especially related to our defense secrets, the jewish-neocons under Bush. The Rothschild banking families. etc. But these are not all jews by a long shot. The vast majority of jewish people are not behind these things or even informed about them. Being anti-Jewish is just as ridiculous as being anti-Christian. As always, there are good people and bad in all groups.]